More than eight months after Nancy Guthrie disappeared from her Tucson-area home, the investigation remains unresolved.

The 84-year-old mother of Today show co-host Savannah Guthrie was last seen on the evening of January 31, 2026. Investigators believe she was abducted from her home in Arizona during the early morning hours of February 1.

Despite an enormous search effort involving the FBI, Pima County Sheriff’s Department and other agencies, Nancy has not been found.

Authorities have released surveillance images of a masked person outside her home, examined possible ransom communications, conducted searches across the Arizona desert and analyzed potential forensic evidence.

But no one has been publicly charged in connection with her disappearance.

The case remains one of the most closely watched missing-person investigations in the United States.

JANUARY 31, 2026 — NANCY’S LAST KNOWN EVENING
Nancy Guthrie spent the evening of January 31 with members of her family.

At approximately 5:32 p.m., she took an Uber to her daughter Annie’s home for dinner.

Investigators later spoke with the Uber driver as part of their effort to reconstruct Nancy’s final known movements.

After dinner, Nancy was driven back to her own home.

Her family dropped her off at approximately 9:48 p.m.

According to Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos, the garage door opened at approximately 9:48 p.m. and closed about two minutes later.

Authorities believe Nancy was inside her home at that point.

It was the last confirmed sighting of her.

FEBRUARY 1 — THE CAMERA DISCONNECTS
Investigators believe Nancy was taken from her home sometime during the early morning hours.

One of the first important clues came from the home’s security system.

At approximately 1:47 a.m., Nancy’s doorbell camera disconnected.

About 25 minutes later, the system detected a person or possible animal, but investigators initially could not access the corresponding video because of the camera’s recording configuration.

Authorities later recovered previously inaccessible surveillance information.

At approximately 2:28 a.m., Nancy’s pacemaker application also disconnected from her phone.

That timing became significant because it suggested that something had happened to Nancy during the overnight period.

FEBRUARY 1 — THE FAMILY REALIZES SHE IS MISSING
Nancy was expected to attend church that Sunday.

When she did not appear, someone from her church contacted her family.

At approximately 11:56 a.m., relatives went to her home and discovered that Nancy was missing.

The family contacted 911 at approximately 12:03 p.m.

When deputies arrived, investigators quickly determined that the circumstances were concerning.

Nancy had not simply left home without explanation.

Authorities later said they believed she had been taken against her will.

THE FIRST SEARCH BEGINS
The FBI and Pima County Sheriff’s Department quickly became involved.

Nancy was considered particularly vulnerable because she had limited mobility, used a pacemaker and required daily medication for a heart condition.

The FBI subsequently offered a reward of up to $50,000 for information leading to Nancy’s recovery and/or the arrest and conviction of anyone responsible for her disappearance.

Family members also made repeated public appeals for information.

Savannah Guthrie and her siblings pleaded directly with whoever might have taken their mother to make contact.

The family said they were willing to communicate and wanted proof that Nancy was alive.

RANSOM COMMUNICATIONS BEGIN TO APPEAR
As the search continued, authorities began receiving communications apparently connected to Nancy’s disappearance.

Some messages demanded cryptocurrency in exchange for Nancy’s return.

One communication reportedly demanded a multimillion-dollar ransom in Bitcoin.

Another suggested that Nancy had died.

However, investigators repeatedly cautioned that not every message connected to the case was necessarily genuine.

The FBI continued to examine the communications for evidence that could identify a real perpetrator.

FEBRUARY 6 — A NEW MESSAGE PROMPTS ACTIVITY
On February 6, authorities acknowledged that they had become aware of another message concerning Nancy.

Investigators conducted follow-up activity at Nancy’s home and surrounding areas.

At that stage, however, officials did not publicly establish that the message was authentic.

The investigation continued to focus on physical evidence, surveillance footage and Nancy’s final known movements rather than relying solely on communications claiming to come from a kidnapper.

FEBRUARY 10 — THE FBI RELEASES SURVEILLANCE IMAGES
One of the biggest developments came on February 10.

The FBI released photographs and short video clips showing a masked individual outside Nancy’s home.

The person appeared to be wearing:

A face covering
Gloves
A backpack
Clothing that concealed much of the individual’s appearance
The footage showed the individual approaching Nancy’s front door and appearing to interfere with the security camera.

In one clip, the person appeared to use a flashlight while standing near the camera.

Authorities described the individual as a person they wanted the public to help identify.

The release dramatically changed the public understanding of the case.

Investigators now had images of someone who appeared to have been at Nancy’s home around the time she disappeared.

A PERSON IS DETAINED
Hours after the FBI released the surveillance images, Pima County deputies detained a person during a traffic stop south of Tucson.

The person was questioned in connection with Nancy’s disappearance.

Investigators, assisted by the FBI, also conducted a court-authorized search of a residence in the Rio Rico area.

The detention generated widespread speculation that authorities had identified the person seen in the surveillance footage.

But investigators did not publicly confirm that the detained individual was the person shown in the images.

The person was subsequently released.

No criminal charge resulted from the detention.

FEBRUARY 11 — THE DETAINED MAN IS RELEASED
The man who had been questioned publicly denied involvement.

He told reporters that he had done nothing wrong.

Authorities did not announce that he was a suspect in the disappearance, and the investigation continued.

The development reinforced an important distinction in the case: being questioned by investigators does not mean someone has been identified as the person responsible.

FEBRUARY 19 — NO EVIDENCE NANCY WAS TAKEN TO MEXICO
Because Nancy disappeared in southern Arizona, investigators also considered the possibility that she could have been taken toward the Mexican border.

Federal authorities communicated with Mexican officials.

However, authorities said there was no evidence at that time indicating that Nancy had been taken into Mexico.

The possibility nevertheless remained part of the broader investigative effort because of the geography of southern Arizona.

DNA EVIDENCE BECOMES AN IMPORTANT FOCUS
In April, investigators revealed that potentially significant DNA evidence recovered from Nancy’s home was being analyzed by the FBI.

The sample had initially been collected in February.

According to sources familiar with the investigation, a private laboratory working with Pima County transferred the material to the FBI for additional analysis.

The FBI’s examination included advanced forensic analysis.

The discovery raised hopes that investigators might eventually be able to identify an unknown person who had entered Nancy’s home.

But officials did not publicly announce a DNA match that led to an arrest.

THE SEARCH EXPANDS
The investigation subsequently expanded beyond Nancy’s home.

Search teams examined areas around Tucson and other locations where investigators believed evidence might potentially be found.

Authorities also asked residents to review home-security footage and other recordings from around the period of Nancy’s disappearance.

Investigators were particularly interested in footage showing unusual vehicles or people in the neighborhood.

The FBI continued accepting tips.

THE FAMILY CONTINUES TO ASK FOR HELP
Savannah Guthrie and her siblings have repeatedly appealed to the public.

The family has emphasized that Nancy’s age and medical needs make finding her particularly urgent.

Savannah has also spoken publicly about her mother’s personality, faith and family life, seeking to keep attention focused on Nancy as a person rather than allowing the case to become only a criminal mystery.

The family has continued to offer a reward for information leading to Nancy’s recovery.

SIX MONTHS PASS WITH NO ANSWERS
By August 2026, Nancy had been missing for approximately six months.

ABC’s detailed timeline reported that she remained missing and that authorities had not publicly identified a person responsible for the disappearance.

The investigation had already generated national attention, but the basic questions remained unanswered:

Where is Nancy?

Who entered her home?

Was the person captured on camera the person responsible?

And what happened after Nancy disappeared?

HUMAN REMAINS ARE FOUND IN THE DESERT
In August, authorities announced that human remains had been discovered in the Tucson desert, approximately 15 miles from the area where investigators believed Nancy had been abducted.

The discovery immediately raised concern because of the proximity to the case.

However, authorities quickly said there was no indication that the remains were connected to Nancy Guthrie.

The discovery therefore did not provide investigators with a breakthrough in the disappearance.

For Nancy’s family, it nevertheless brought renewed attention to the continuing uncertainty surrounding the case.

SEPTEMBER — ANOTHER POSSIBLE RANSOM MESSAGE
In late September, authorities learned about another message that appeared to be connected to Nancy’s disappearance.

The Pima County Sheriff’s Department and FBI examined the communication.

After investigating it, authorities determined that the message was not credible.

Officials also warned that people were attempting to exploit the case and urged the public not to send money or personal information in response to unsolicited communications.

The development was particularly significant because ransom communications had appeared several times throughout the investigation.

Authorities have continued to examine the messages individually rather than assuming every communication comes from the person responsible.

THE CASE REMAINS CLASSIFIED AS AN ABDUCTION
Despite the absence of an arrest, investigators continue to treat Nancy’s disappearance as an apparent abduction.

The FBI has previously described the case as involving a vulnerable adult who was last seen at her Tucson-area residence.

Investigators believe she did not leave voluntarily.

Surveillance footage showing a masked individual near her home remains one of the most significant publicly released pieces of evidence.

But the footage does not by itself establish the person’s identity or prove what happened to Nancy afterward.

THERE IS STILL NO PUBLICLY NAMED SUSPECT
More than eight months into the investigation, authorities have not publicly named a primary suspect or charged anyone in Nancy’s disappearance.

The person detained in February was released.

No public announcement has established that the masked individual captured by the FBI has been identified.

Authorities also have not publicly announced a ransom payment or confirmed that Nancy was ever held for ransom.

Those unanswered questions continue to complicate the investigation.

WHAT INVESTIGATORS KNOW
Based on publicly released information, authorities have established several important points:

Nancy was home on the night of January 31.

Her family dropped her off around 9:48 p.m., and the garage closed around 9:50 p.m.

Her security system showed unusual activity.

The doorbell camera disconnected at 1:47 a.m., followed by a system detection of a person or possible animal at approximately 2:12 a.m.

Her pacemaker application disconnected from her phone.

That occurred at approximately 2:28 a.m.

She was missing by the following morning.

Her family discovered her absence before noon and called 911 shortly afterward.

The FBI recovered surveillance images.

The footage showed a masked individual outside the residence.

Investigators have examined potential DNA evidence.

Material recovered from Nancy’s home was sent to the FBI for analysis.

But none of these developments has yet resulted in a publicly announced arrest or criminal charge.

WHAT REMAINS UNKNOWN
The biggest unanswered questions are still the most basic ones.

Investigators have not publicly explained exactly how Nancy was removed from her home.

They have not identified the person captured in the FBI surveillance footage.

They have not publicly established whether a ransom demand came from the person responsible.

And, most importantly, Nancy’s whereabouts remain unknown.

LATEST UPDATE — OCTOBER 6, 2026
As of October 6, 2026, Nancy Guthrie remains missing.

The most recent major development came in late September, when authorities investigated a new possible ransom message and determined that it was not credible. The Pima County Sheriff’s Department also warned about people attempting to exploit the case.

There is still no publicly identified main suspect, no criminal charge and no confirmed recovery of Nancy Guthrie.

The FBI and Pima County Sheriff’s Department continue to investigate.

The FBI is offering up to $50,000 for information leading to Nancy’s recovery and/or the arrest and conviction of anyone involved in her disappearance.

For Nancy’s family, the central hope remains unchanged: finding her and finally determining what happened after she disappeared from her Tucson-area home.

Until that happens, the February 1 timeline — the disconnected camera, the mysterious figure outside the house and the loss of contact with Nancy’s pacemaker — remains at the center of one of the most perplexing missing-person investigations in the country.

OFFICIAL / PRIMARY SOURCES
FBI — Nancy Guthrie reward and case information